Hunger Games

This forum is for anything that doesn't specifically have to do with Better Than Wolves
User avatar
Yamboyz1
Posts: 461
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 10:20 pm

Hunger Games

Post by Yamboyz1 »

So I just saw the Hunger Games with a couple of friends, and I have to admit, it was really really good. I haven't actually read the books so I had no idea what to expect, but now I actually want to read the books because the movie was a definite 9/10, I'd say.
Always bear in mind that your own resolution to succeed is more important than any other.

-Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
jorgebonafe
Posts: 2714
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:22 am
Location: Brasil

Re: Hunger Games

Post by jorgebonafe »

I read the trilogy and really liked it. The movie was just released in the theaters here, I'll watch it tomorrow probably
Better Than Wolves was borne of anal sex. True Story.
User avatar
HavokSCOUT
Posts: 514
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 8:44 am
Location: Surrounded by creepers

Re: Hunger Games

Post by HavokSCOUT »

I just came back from the movie, And I've read the books. The movie was very well done, with only a few small differences. Honestly, the most disappointing part was how Madge didn't give the pin to Katniss. The fire scene was exquisite.
Spoiler
Show
Brony, and proud of it
CheGiuAn wrote:ppl should have faith, not religion....
Katalliaan wrote:It's a tech shrub, more like
MagikEh wrote: D: THE SEEKRET OF SYRUPEY BEAVER NIPPLES HAS BEEN EXPOSED!!! ABORT~!~!
User avatar
PureZaros
Posts: 151
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 9:35 pm
Location: With a herd of alpaca in the La Raya mountains

Re: Hunger Games

Post by PureZaros »

I've read the first book of the series and I liked it a lot. The second and third I'm hesitant to read, because I've heard that they aren't very good. I'm even more reluctant to watch the move, though, because a bad movie can ruin the book. Eragon and Harry Potter 5 and 6 (?) saw to that.
Spoiler
Show
FlowerChild wrote:
Panda wrote:Edit: Thanks for the sticky good sir. <3
I really wish more women said things like this.
User avatar
Folrig
Posts: 199
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 1:34 am
Location: United States

Re: Hunger Games

Post by Folrig »

I was quite impressed. I've only read the first book, but my wife says the whole pin thing doesn't screw up to story in the long run.

Honestly though, I expected the movie to be terrible. I can't remember the last book-to-movie where the stories were almost identical.

Does this mean that producers and directors are learning?
This...all of this...is just...wonky!
User avatar
RaustBlackDragon
Posts: 1748
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:25 pm

Re: Hunger Games

Post by RaustBlackDragon »

Folrig wrote:I was quite impressed. I've only read the first book, but my wife says the whole pin thing doesn't screw up to story in the long run.

Honestly though, I expected the movie to be terrible. I can't remember the last book-to-movie where the stories were almost identical.

Does this mean that producers and directors are learning?
I've tried converting a story to another medium, it's not actually as straightforward as you might think. Some things don't work as well in the new medium, and it's actually a good idea to change them. Not saying that's always the case, but it's not insanity that drives people to change plot points :)
What's the price of freedom now?
Can you cut me a deal?
A crate of wholesale liberty,
or a justice combo meal?
User avatar
HavokSCOUT
Posts: 514
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 8:44 am
Location: Surrounded by creepers

Re: Hunger Games

Post by HavokSCOUT »

Folrig wrote:I was quite impressed. I've only read the first book, but my wife says the whole pin thing doesn't screw up to story in the long run.

Honestly though, I expected the movie to be terrible. I can't remember the last book-to-movie where the stories were almost identical.

Does this mean that producers and directors are learning?
Actually, Suzanne Collins, the author, was one of the writers and an executive producer. That's what really made the difference, in my opinion.
Spoiler
Show
Brony, and proud of it
CheGiuAn wrote:ppl should have faith, not religion....
Katalliaan wrote:It's a tech shrub, more like
MagikEh wrote: D: THE SEEKRET OF SYRUPEY BEAVER NIPPLES HAS BEEN EXPOSED!!! ABORT~!~!
User avatar
TheAnarchitect
Posts: 1010
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:21 pm
Location: St. Louis

Re: Hunger Games

Post by TheAnarchitect »

So, if and when we get a BTW server, who wants to run the Hunger Games?
The infinitely extendable Pottery system
Real Life is an Anarchy Server.
User avatar
jorgebonafe
Posts: 2714
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:22 am
Location: Brasil

Re: Hunger Games

Post by jorgebonafe »

TheAnarchitect wrote:So, if and when we get a BTW server, who wants to run the Hunger Games?
The Hunger Games is there already, didn't you know? Its on Edolas anarchy. And Razzle plays the part of Katniss.
Better Than Wolves was borne of anal sex. True Story.
User avatar
TheAnarchitect
Posts: 1010
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:21 pm
Location: St. Louis

Re: Hunger Games

Post by TheAnarchitect »

Ah yes. I haven't been to Edolas, because it turns out I can't stand to play vMC anymore.
The infinitely extendable Pottery system
Real Life is an Anarchy Server.
User avatar
Poppycocks
Posts: 825
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 2:11 pm

Re: Hunger Games

Post by Poppycocks »

TheAnarchitect wrote:Ah yes. I haven't been to Edolas, because it turns out I can't stand to play vMC anymore.
Same, it would appear, that I'm utterly spoiled.

How can you people play without something as basic as a stupid hopper?
User avatar
Xekrom337
Posts: 154
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 7:59 am

Re: Hunger Games

Post by Xekrom337 »

Poppycocks wrote:
TheAnarchitect wrote:Ah yes. I haven't been to Edolas, because it turns out I can't stand to play vMC anymore.
Same, it would appear, that I'm utterly spoiled.

How can you people play without something as basic as a stupid hopper?
i once broke a diamond hoe on a server looking for hemp seeds :D
then i got depressed and went back to BTW.
User avatar
Folrig
Posts: 199
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 1:34 am
Location: United States

Re: Hunger Games

Post by Folrig »

RaustBlackDragon wrote: I've tried converting a story to another medium, it's not actually as straightforward as you might think. Some things don't work as well in the new medium, and it's actually a good idea to change them. Not saying that's always the case, but it's not insanity that drives people to change plot points :)
Oh, I believe you. I also imagine it takes a very strong writer and/or director to keep the stories close and still keep it entertaining.
HavocSCOUT wrote: Actually, Suzanne Collins, the author, was one of the writers and an executive producer. That's what really made the difference, in my opinion.
It certainly didn't hurt :)
This...all of this...is just...wonky!
User avatar
walker_boh_65
Posts: 2304
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 9:40 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: Hunger Games

Post by walker_boh_65 »

First off, I must say that even though I did not read the books, I thought this was an awesome movie. Honestly a 9.5 out of 10 in my book. And the .5 off was because I felt some parts felt a bit rushed, but overall it was a great movie. I recommend it to everyone.
User avatar
Joeyjoebob
Posts: 113
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 5:14 pm

Re: Hunger Games

Post by Joeyjoebob »

Very good movie, and it stuck extremely well to the book. There were a few things missing, but it's not every day I'm impressed by a movie adapted from a book. I really loved the depictions of the Capital citizens.
TheAnarchitect wrote:
TaterBoy wrote:Well, now I know. And as GI-Joe says, knowing is half the battle. :)
The other half is violence...
User avatar
jorgebonafe
Posts: 2714
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:22 am
Location: Brasil

Re: Hunger Games

Post by jorgebonafe »

I just watched it, and it was just as awesome as I expected. Honestly one of the best book adaptations I've seen, right there next to the Girl With the Dragon Tattoo.
Better Than Wolves was borne of anal sex. True Story.
User avatar
MoRmEnGiL
Posts: 1728
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2011 5:29 pm
Location: Bosom Higgs

Re: Hunger Games

Post by MoRmEnGiL »

Looks like everyone liked the film. This is a very good indication that I won't :P
War..
War never changes.

Remember what the dormouse said
User avatar
DaveYanakov
Posts: 2090
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 5:17 am

Re: Hunger Games

Post by DaveYanakov »

And yet everyone loves Thunderdome...
Better is the enemy of Good
User avatar
FaceFoiled
Posts: 928
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 10:21 pm

Re: Hunger Games

Post by FaceFoiled »

I watched it last Friday, and I enjoyed the first half of the movie. When the actual "games" started it all went to shit for me. I have not read the book, and was not sure what to expect but I do love the Battle Royal book and movie. The way I went into this was with the mindset of "western/modern version of battle royal".

What it ended up was a good setup with interesting characters, and when the action started it was all rubbish. And what was up with the camera work?! Seriously, never heard of a Steadycam? My god how can they not view the action footage and realize that watching a blurry bad caption is bad? I get the "chaos filming" to be taken as, being part of the action that is going on, but it was just horrible to watch those parts.
User avatar
FlowerChild
Site Admin
Posts: 18753
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 7:24 pm

Re: Hunger Games

Post by FlowerChild »

DaveYanakov wrote:And yet everyone loves Thunderdome...
Actually, I hated Thunderdome :)

Saw Hunger Games last night and quite enjoyed it though.
User avatar
MoRmEnGiL
Posts: 1728
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2011 5:29 pm
Location: Bosom Higgs

Re: Hunger Games

Post by MoRmEnGiL »

Well, thunderdome is very sub-par compared to the first two ones, but I can't say I really hate it as such though..
War..
War never changes.

Remember what the dormouse said
User avatar
FlowerChild
Site Admin
Posts: 18753
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 7:24 pm

Re: Hunger Games

Post by FlowerChild »

MoRmEnGiL wrote:Well, thunderdome is very sub-par compared to the first two ones, but I can't say I really hate it as such though..
I liked the beginning, all the way up until he meets the kids, and the ending wasn't bad. I think that's a pretty standard fan reaction. "Hate" might be too strong a word.
User avatar
RaustBlackDragon
Posts: 1748
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:25 pm

Re: Hunger Games

Post by RaustBlackDragon »

Oh come on, can't we just get BEYOND THUNDERDOME?
What's the price of freedom now?
Can you cut me a deal?
A crate of wholesale liberty,
or a justice combo meal?
User avatar
FlowerChild
Site Admin
Posts: 18753
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 7:24 pm

Re: Hunger Games

Post by FlowerChild »

RaustBlackDragon wrote:Oh come on, can't we just get BEYOND THUNDERDOME?
Maybe. We'll have to see what the sequel that's supposedly been in the works forever is like. They're already off to a bad start with no Mel Gibson though IMO. An old Max would have been pretty cool.

EDIT: Actually...revising my earlier statement, I liked Thunderdome UNTIL the end of the fight in the Thunderdome itself. Just a few minutes difference until he meets the kids, but I think that's the precise point where the movie took a turn for the worse. The whole "let's give Max a heart" idea was what messed it up IMO, and that's where it begins. It's kinda like the whole "Han shot first" thing. Max always had an aspect of anti-hero to him, and messing with that was where it went wrong.
User avatar
DaveYanakov
Posts: 2090
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 5:17 am

Re: Hunger Games

Post by DaveYanakov »

I have to agree on the end of that fight but I was able to overlook the rest of it. The lesser movie for me was actually the original. THat may be because I was way too young to get what was going on last time I saw it though.

Guess I have a plan for this week while I wait for videocard payday.
Better is the enemy of Good
Post Reply